Wrong test scope
A disruptive test can start without a shared decision about risk and permissions.
QA and release evidence
ClusterPilot links each Sonobuoy test to the exact cluster, release, settings, permissions, result and cleanup status. QA and platform teams see the same record.
Operational challenge
A reliable test also needs the right tool version, clear permissions, saved results and proof that temporary resources were removed.
A disruptive test can start without a shared decision about risk and permissions.
Results may stay on a workstation and lose their link to the exact cluster and release.
Temporary namespaces, workloads or credentials may remain after the test.
Enterprise value
The value comes from shared state, explicit ownership and reviewable execution.
Cluster state, selected mode, permissions, tool identity, storage and disruption boundary are checked before execution.
Result, logs, archives, checksums, cluster/release identity and timestamps remain tied to the run.
Cleanup is a first-class state with evidence, timeout and a safe operator next action.
Controlled workflow
The validation path stays inspectable before, during and after Sonobuoy execution.
Choose the approved mode, cluster and release; validate health, permissions, capacity, storage and tool digest.
Create an OperationRun, follow ordered preparation and Sonobuoy steps, and retain correlated events and logs.
Capture status, result archive, checksums, summaries, cluster identity, inputs and exact tool version.
Remove temporary resources, prove cleanup and record the release/environment acceptance decision.
Evidence
The validation record answers what ran, where it ran, what it produced and whether the environment returned to a known state.
Cluster identity, Kubernetes version, release, Sonobuoy mode, plugin selection and admission decision.
Terminal status, summary, archives, checksums, logs, durations and stable failure context.
Cleanup outcome, retained artifacts, reviewer decision, expiry and link to the evaluated release.
Honest product boundary
Frequently asked questions
Clear answers about fit, boundaries and the evaluation path.
The v0.0.1 documentation defines a pinned Sonobuoy workflow and records the exact tool identity with each validation run.
No. The result is evidence for the tested cluster, release, scope and time. Certification and regulatory conclusions require their own process.
Cleanup remains visible as an operation state with diagnostics and a safe next action; the workflow should not be accepted while residual resources are unexplained.
Capability scope: v0.0.1 release candidate. Review the current release boundary →
Start with a measurable workflow
We will review the environment, operational bottleneck, control boundaries and evidence needed for a decision.
hello@clusterpilot.de